Papers and Outlines for the Workshop on Evaluating Students and Evaluating Outputs: Vision, Revision, Envision: Critical Perspectives in Assessment

Thursday, January 6, 2005

If a session or speaker is missing, we have not received any materials for that session or speaker. Submit papers to sprichard@aals.org.

All materials are in PDF format (Adobe Acrobat required).

View Speaker Bios | View Complete Workshop Program

9:30 – 10:30 a.m.
Vision: Transforming Reassessment

  • Linking Process of Cognitive Breakthrough
    Katharine K. Duvivier, University of Denver (view outline) (view presentation)
  • Lawyering Program Grid
    Aderson Francois, New York University (view outline)
  • Empirical Study of Development of Legal Reasoning Skills
    Stefan H. Krieger, Hofstra University (view outline)

The panelists are asked to re-imagine the goals, methods and criteria for measuring achievement and/or competence and discuss what we would do in an ideal world.

10:45 a.m. – 11:45 a.m.
Small Group Discussions: Visions

Participants will break into 15 small groups to discuss the following issue: Free yourself from your and your school’s previous practices. What methods of evaluation would be better? Groups will report back to the full group. During the wrap-up, participants will vote for the best/most creative idea, and the group members receiving the most votes will receive a prize.
Small Group #3
Small Group Leader: Jeremy Miller, Chapman University (view outline)

2:00 – 3:30 p.m.
Revision: Improving Assessment Ballroom Level
Gregory Scott Munro, University of Montana (view outline)
Ann C. Shalleck, American University (view outline)

This session will explore ideas to enhance existing models of constructing and grading examinations and will include a discussion of essays, multiple choice and performance tests and the use of grading guidelines.

3:45 – 5:00 p.m.
Envision: Experiments in Alternative Assessment Ballroom Level

  • Use of Classroom Performance System
    Dorothy Andrea Brown, Washington and Lee University (view outline)
  • A Better Alternative to the Traditional End-of-Semester Exam
    Larry Cunningham, Texas Tech University (view outline)
  • Experiment in Assessment
    Douglas R. Haddock, St. Mary's University (view outline)

A number of law professors, cognizant of the shortcomings of the prevalent methods of assessment, have adopted alternative assessment techniques. Four of our colleagues will discuss and demonstrate how they use writing, collaboration, and technology to enhance the learning of students in their doctrinal and skills courses.