Back to:
Workshop Program
Materials by:
Speaker
Materials by day:
Friday
Annual Meeting Home
|
Friday, January 3, 2003 8:45 a.m.-5:30 p.m.
Annual Meeting Workshop on Dispute Resolution:
Raising the Bar and Enlarging the Canon
Concurrent Session: Multi-Party Dispute Resolution
Multi-Party Mediation
Michael K. Lewis
ADR Associates, LLC
 
- Some common differences between multi-party disputes and other types of disputes brought to mediation
- Governments often involved
- Clients often not directly involved
- May be difficult to identify all stakeholders
- Implementation of any agreement may be difficult
- The Mediator's roles
- Mediating across the table
- Mediating among the parties on one side of the table
- Dealing with political actors important to the resolution of the dispute
- Helping to ensure implementation of any agreement
- Communicating with parties not at the table
- Recurring Issues
- The role of confidentiality.
- The role of public participation
- If dispute is a legal case, the mediator's role viz a viz the court
- The mediator's continuing responsibility post-agreement
- Two examples
- Pigford v. Veneman, the Black Farmers' law suit
- Class action filed against the Department of Agriculture for discrimination in its credit programs
- Class of approximately 23,000
- Consent Decree provided an opportunity for every claimant to demonstrate that they had been discriminated against, but required no structural change at USDA.
- The Helen Kramer Landfill
- Case brought by the USEPA (and the NJDEP) against approximately 300 parties for violation of CERCLA and the New Jersey Spill Act.
- Questions: Who pays what? Natural Resources were damaged, how are they to be fixed? Who does the work to fix things?
- Among the parties: private companies, large and small; approximately 20 surrounding municipalities; New Jersey state agencies as plaintiffs and defendants.
|